Here's why this terminology is problematic:
* Varied Training Standards: Different trainers and organizations use their own methods and criteria for training protection dogs, leading to inconsistencies in skill levels.
* Lack of Certification: There is no standardized certification process for protection dogs, making it difficult to assess their true capabilities.
* Misleading Terminology: Using levels like "Level 1" can be misleading as it implies a clear hierarchy of skills, while the reality is more nuanced.
Instead of relying on specific levels, it's more important to consider these factors when evaluating a protection dog:
* Training Philosophy: Understand the trainer's approach and their experience with protection dog training.
* Specific Skills: Identify the specific skills you need, such as deterrence, obedience, or aggression control.
* Temperament and Breed: Consider the dog's temperament, breed characteristics, and suitability for your specific needs.
* Independent Assessment: If possible, seek an independent assessment by a qualified professional to evaluate the dog's abilities.
Remember:
* Protection dogs are serious tools and require responsible ownership.
* Seek out reputable trainers with proven experience and ethical practices.
* Never rely on misleading or undefined terminology when choosing a protection dog.
It's crucial to prioritize responsible training and ethical practices when considering a protection dog. Instead of focusing on arbitrary levels, focus on understanding the specific skills, temperament, and training of the dog to ensure a suitable match for your needs.