Here's why it's so hard to determine the "accredited" party:
* No written records: Early humans didn't leave behind detailed accounts of their interactions with wolves. The process happened before the advent of written history.
* Multiple locations: Archaeological evidence suggests that dog domestication likely occurred independently in multiple regions of the world, possibly in Europe, Asia, and North America.
* Gradual evolution: The process of domestication wasn't a sudden event. It involved generations of selective breeding, favoring wolves with desirable traits like tameness and sociability. This process is difficult to track definitively.
What we do know:
* Early humans likely interacted with wolves in various ways: They may have scavenged on wolf kills, co-existed with them in their settlements, or even intentionally kept wolf pups as companions.
* Wolves with desirable traits were likely favored: Humans may have favored wolves that were less aggressive, easier to handle, or helpful in hunting.
* Over time, these traits became more pronounced: The offspring of these wolves inherited similar traits, leading to a distinct population with dog-like characteristics.
Therefore, while we can't definitively credit anyone with domesticating wolves, it was a collective effort across multiple groups of early humans over an extended period. This process was driven by human interaction with wolves, selective breeding, and the gradual evolution of desirable traits.