However, there is less consensus on the specific actions that should be taken to address animal extinction. Some people argue that the focus should be on conserving and restoring natural habitats, while others believe that captive breeding and other assisted reproductive technologies are necessary to save critically endangered species. Some even believe that drastic measures, such as genetic engineering, are justified in order to prevent the extinction of certain species.
Ultimately, the most effective approach to addressing animal extinction likely involves a combination of these different strategies, tailored to the specific circumstances of each species. However, it is clear that public support for conservation efforts is essential, and that educating the public about the importance of biodiversity is a critical step in protecting the planet's endangered species.
Here are some specific examples of public opinion on animal extinction:
* A 2019 survey by the World Wildlife Fund found that 84% of people globally are concerned about the loss of biodiversity, and 79% believe that humans are responsible for it.
* A 2017 survey by the US Fish and Wildlife Service found that 90% of Americans support the Endangered Species Act, which is a federal law that protects endangered species and their habitats.
* A 2016 survey by the National Audubon Society found that 78% of Americans believe that birds are important indicators of environmental health, and 70% believe that protecting bird species is important.
These surveys suggest that there is a strong public interest in protecting endangered species and conserving biodiversity. However, it is important to note that public opinion can change over time, and that the specific policies and actions that are supported may vary depending on the context.